IVC Filters Get New Codes
CPT 2012 has added new codes for insertion, repositioning and removal of an intravascular vena cava (IVC) filter.
37191 - Insertion of intravascular vena cava filter, endovascular approach including vascular access, vessel selection and radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural roadmapping, and imaging guidance (ultrasound and fluoroscopy), when performed.
37192 - Repositioning of intravascular vena cava filter, endovascular approach including vascular access, vessel selection and radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural roadmapping and imaging guidance (ultrasound and fluoroscopy), when provided.
37193 - Retrieval (removal) of intravascular vena cava endovascular approach including vascular access, vessel selection, and radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural roadmapping, and imaging guidance (ultrasound and fluoroscopy), when performed.
Per the code descriptor, 37191 is an all-in-one code and includes all elements. Due to this, CPT has deleted IVC codes 37620 and 35940. Catheterization codes 36010 (non-selective) and 36011-36012 (selective) are still valid but cannot be reported in conjunction with 37191 as catheter placement is included. Typically, IVC filters are placed in the inferior vena cava, but these codes will also apply to superior vena cava filters.
If the IVC filter requires repositioning, per CPT, report 37192 for this service. This code cannot be reported for repositioning during filter placement as this is not the intent of the code. There is also a specific note in CPT which states “Do not report 37192 in conjunction with 37191.”
It has always been difficult to assign the correct code for removal of an IVC filter. Some carriers want an “unlisted” code while others want code 75961 with code 37203. For 2012, you can now report new code 37193 for removal. This code is also an all-in-one code and the only code needed.
In late summer, 2012, we contracted with APS to do our pathology billing. The company we were previously using lacked experience and know-how in clinical pathology professional component billing. APS has completely fulfilled all of our expectations, both in clinical pathology professional component billing and in all other areas of pathology billing. They performed an audit of our CPT coding and pointed out some areas in which we could improve. Interestingly, a reference lab we were using had erroneously instructed us in how to bill for a certain cytology examination. When APS identified the incorrect CPT coding, the reference lab, after some initial resistance, changed their CPT coding practice for this test. In November 2012, when we renegotiated our contract with the hospital, the CEO of APS flew to Salt Lake City and attended the negotiating meeting. His input during the meeting was extremely valuable in helping us obtain a satisfactory contract. Most significantly, in February, 2013, the hospital where we practice changed the hospital/laboratory information system. The initial interface the computer company offered for transmission of billing information was not satisfactory. APS made heroic efforts in helping the computer company get a satisfactory interface system in place. The APS sales and other personnel with whom I have interacted are highly knowledgeable and very pleasant. If a pathology group is dissatisfied with their current billing arrangement, I highly recommend APS. They have done a fantastic job for us.
Salt Lake City, UT
View More Testimonials